This was a very insightful debate that left me sad and frustrated.
Here are two prominent public intellectuals that agree that the DEI ideology has the potential to tear our society apart by alienating different fractions rather than bringing them together. How is it that we end up in a debate arguing who is right or wrong, the winner tha…
This was a very insightful debate that left me sad and frustrated.
Here are two prominent public intellectuals that agree that the DEI ideology has the potential to tear our society apart by alienating different fractions rather than bringing them together. How is it that we end up in a debate arguing who is right or wrong, the winner that claims it all, rather than demonstrating how we can truly advance a debate by listening to each other and then finding common ground to make a difference. Rufo just send out an email linking to the debate suggesting he had the upper hand.
If Christopher and Yascha can't come together, even though they agree on the overall problem, are very articulate and well researched in their positions, then how is the rest of the country supposed to do it?
This was a very insightful debate that left me sad and frustrated.
Here are two prominent public intellectuals that agree that the DEI ideology has the potential to tear our society apart by alienating different fractions rather than bringing them together. How is it that we end up in a debate arguing who is right or wrong, the winner that claims it all, rather than demonstrating how we can truly advance a debate by listening to each other and then finding common ground to make a difference. Rufo just send out an email linking to the debate suggesting he had the upper hand.
If Christopher and Yascha can't come together, even though they agree on the overall problem, are very articulate and well researched in their positions, then how is the rest of the country supposed to do it?
Exactly precisely what I think. Such a disappointment!