He argues that "As narrowed by the Court of Appeals, the stay that would apply if we failed to broaden it would not remove mifepristone from the market. It would simply restore the circumstances that existed (and that the Government defended) from 2000 to 2016 under three Presidential administrations."
For those who are interested, the original Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine vs FDA complaint as at https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca5/23-10362/23-10362-2023-04-12.pdf?ts=1681387283
I realize the complaints are usually slanted, but it contains interesting facts to be aware of.
And the Alito dissent is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22a901_3d9g.pdf
He argues that "As narrowed by the Court of Appeals, the stay that would apply if we failed to broaden it would not remove mifepristone from the market. It would simply restore the circumstances that existed (and that the Government defended) from 2000 to 2016 under three Presidential administrations."