I like the concept of these debates, but a big problem with them seems to be a lack of sufficient table-setting about what's actually being debated. I'm maybe 2/3 of the way through so far, but I would have loved to see less time spent on what criminal justice reform actually *means* and more on the effects (or lack thereof) of specific policies.
I like the concept of these debates, but a big problem with them seems to be a lack of sufficient table-setting about what's actually being debated. I'm maybe 2/3 of the way through so far, but I would have loved to see less time spent on what criminal justice reform actually *means* and more on the effects (or lack thereof) of specific policies.
I like the concept of these debates, but a big problem with them seems to be a lack of sufficient table-setting about what's actually being debated. I'm maybe 2/3 of the way through so far, but I would have loved to see less time spent on what criminal justice reform actually *means* and more on the effects (or lack thereof) of specific policies.