FOR FREE PEOPLE

FOR FREE PEOPLE

“Hungry for a loftier state of being, many somehow imagine they have found it in bashing the dull machinery of representational government,” writes Martin Gurri. (Photo by Stephanie Keith via Getty Images)

Martin Gurri: Mistaking Politics for Religion

What are we to do with those who seek redemption from an institution explicitly designed not to provide it?

Martin Gurri, author of The Revolt of the Public, is one of the most incisive explainers of our age. The former CIA analyst predicted the rise of Trump and populism across the globe. Now, in his latest column for The Free Press, reprinted from Discourse, he writes of the “fanatics” who seek redemption from our complex political system.

We are told from many quarters that something called “our democracy” is in mortal danger. The feeling of dread is pervasive: Google “our democracy in danger” and you get 70 million hits. The headlines have been frightening. Here’s The New York Times: “Will 2024 be the year American democracy dies?” NBC: “Election officials say democracy is still at risk in 2024.” Financial Times: “Can democracy survive 2024?” The putative cause of death is usually Donald Trump—but it also could be the deep state, social media, or Vladimir Putin. One way or another, our beloved democracy seems to be on the verge of annihilation.

I come with good news. We can’t lose our democracy because we never had one.

Our system is called “representative government.” It enjoys brief spasms of democratic involvement—elections, trials by jury—but by and large it glories in being densely and opaquely mediated, and many of its operations are patently undemocratic—appointed judges, for example, or the Electoral College. This is a feature, not a bug, of the system. By making sure the right hand of power seldom knows what the left hand is doing, the Framers sought to prevent various flavors of tyranny—including, in James Madison’s words, “an unjust combination of the majority.” Despite the media drama over a Trump dictatorship, we can safely say that they achieved their objective.

This post is for paying subscribers only

Subscribe

Already have an account? Log in

our Comments

Use common sense here: disagree, debate, but don't be a .

the fp logo
comment bg

Welcome to The FP Community!

Our comments are an editorial product for our readers to have smart, thoughtful conversations and debates — the sort we need more of in America today. The sort of debate we love.   

We have standards in our comments section just as we do in our journalism. If you’re being a jerk, we might delete that one. And if you’re being a jerk for a long time, we might remove you from the comments section. 

Common Sense was our original name, so please use some when posting. Here are some guidelines:

  • We have a simple rule for all Free Press staff: act online the way you act in real life. We think that’s a good rule for everyone.
  • We drop an occasional F-bomb ourselves, but try to keep your profanities in check. We’re proud to have Free Press readers of every age, and we want to model good behavior for them. (Hello to Intern Julia!)
  • Speaking of obscenities, don’t hurl them at each other. Harassment, threats, and derogatory comments that derail productive conversation are a hard no.
  • Criticizing and wrestling with what you read here is great. Our rule of thumb is that smart people debate ideas, dumb people debate identity. So keep it classy. 
  • Don’t spam, solicit, or advertise here. Submit your recommendations to tips@thefp.com if you really think our audience needs to hear about it.
Close Guidelines

Latest