Two things: reading through some of the comments, there seems to be a misunderstanding of the proud boys and path keepers. They have proven themselves to be violent and not so dedicated to the democracy! So really fringe nuts.
Second: the article isn’t really about the PB’s or OK’s and that is a hard question to be answered and asked! We …
Two things: reading through some of the comments, there seems to be a misunderstanding of the proud boys and path keepers. They have proven themselves to be violent and not so dedicated to the democracy! So really fringe nuts.
Second: the article isn’t really about the PB’s or OK’s and that is a hard question to be answered and asked! We don’t want to censor anyone’s free speech! But, how to calm blatantly false narratives or at least steer readers to facts?
Two things: reading through some of the comments, there seems to be a misunderstanding of the proud boys and path keepers. They have proven themselves to be violent and not so dedicated to the democracy! So really fringe nuts.
Second: the article isn’t really about the PB’s or OK’s and that is a hard question to be answered and asked! We don’t want to censor anyone’s free speech! But, how to calm blatantly false narratives or at least steer readers to facts?