You correctly point out what is coming but you fail to totally characterize tis danger. Even you pick and choose whom to defund/deplatform: who wouldn't want to attack Proud Boys or Oath Keepers. Ban one and you ultimately ban them all. You have to know that. Either we allow free speech or we don't. If its uncomfortable then combat …
You correctly point out what is coming but you fail to totally characterize tis danger. Even you pick and choose whom to defund/deplatform: who wouldn't want to attack Proud Boys or Oath Keepers. Ban one and you ultimately ban them all. You have to know that. Either we allow free speech or we don't. If its uncomfortable then combat it in its existence not by trying to eliminate it. These are ideas -- they don't follow orders. Any of this thought censorship ultimately leads to a police state. Only self-government can keep us free.
You correctly point out what is coming but you fail to totally characterize tis danger. Even you pick and choose whom to defund/deplatform: who wouldn't want to attack Proud Boys or Oath Keepers. Ban one and you ultimately ban them all. You have to know that. Either we allow free speech or we don't. If its uncomfortable then combat it in its existence not by trying to eliminate it. These are ideas -- they don't follow orders. Any of this thought censorship ultimately leads to a police state. Only self-government can keep us free.