Using Fanon presumes the existence of “colonization” to begin with, a “fact” for which there is no evidence. Because the precondition does not exist, the theory (or its sketch as used by academics today) is irrelevant.
Using Fanon presumes the existence of “colonization” to begin with, a “fact” for which there is no evidence. Because the precondition does not exist, the theory (or its sketch as used by academics today) is irrelevant.
Using Fanon presumes the existence of “colonization” to begin with, a “fact” for which there is no evidence. Because the precondition does not exist, the theory (or its sketch as used by academics today) is irrelevant.