Every Kat Rosenfield article on the FP seems to be a variation on "Think X is bad? Actually, X is good!" Not that they aren't interesting most of the time: it's a good schtick... if intentional.
Every Kat Rosenfield article on the FP seems to be a variation on "Think X is bad? Actually, X is good!" Not that they aren't interesting most of the time: it's a good schtick... if intentional.
Every Kat Rosenfield article on the FP seems to be a variation on "Think X is bad? Actually, X is good!" Not that they aren't interesting most of the time: it's a good schtick... if intentional.