Beautifully written - and this is worth pointing out: one reason Christianity flourished in the first few centuries was the unorthodox practice of protecting women, widows, orphans and babies.
Beautifully written - and this is worth pointing out: one reason Christianity flourished in the first few centuries was the unorthodox practice of protecting women, widows, orphans and babies.
Is it right to protect the vulnerable? Why? How do you know? Cultural relativism will always create a logical fallacy problem.
If there is no fundamental truth, then of course mutilating your daughter's genitals (so she will never be able to have an orgasm) and marrying her off at nine years old is just - normal. Who are you to judge? Isn't it the same as allowing your daughter to cut off her healthy breasts, or your son his functional penis, for the cultural affirmation rites of the new progressive left?
Beautifully written - and this is worth pointing out: one reason Christianity flourished in the first few centuries was the unorthodox practice of protecting women, widows, orphans and babies.
https://www.breakpoint.org/the-early-churchs-protection-of-women-and-children/
Is it right to protect the vulnerable? Why? How do you know? Cultural relativism will always create a logical fallacy problem.
If there is no fundamental truth, then of course mutilating your daughter's genitals (so she will never be able to have an orgasm) and marrying her off at nine years old is just - normal. Who are you to judge? Isn't it the same as allowing your daughter to cut off her healthy breasts, or your son his functional penis, for the cultural affirmation rites of the new progressive left?