I had been reading the Guardian, as well as the BBC, The Sun, The Independent, plus multiple other worldwide newspapers for decades. I stopped reading the Guardian about five years ago when it became clear they are a one trick pony. There is nothing neutral written in that paper; everything has an ultra progressive slant. I studiously …
I had been reading the Guardian, as well as the BBC, The Sun, The Independent, plus multiple other worldwide newspapers for decades. I stopped reading the Guardian about five years ago when it became clear they are a one trick pony. There is nothing neutral written in that paper; everything has an ultra progressive slant. I studiously avoid ANY publication that has an obvious agenda; why else would I be subscribing to substacks??? Does that not speak for itself? I don't need to list my reading material here to prove anything; but I will tell you that my last two books were a history of slavery in the U.S. written in 1872 by Henry Wilson; 3 volumes done; over 2400 pages; and the history of Ireland's conquest by England, going back to the Anglo Saxon and Norman conquests of the 1000's and the papal decree giving Ireland to England, including in detail the political and industrial tactics used by England and the Aristocracy to violently, culturally and financially oppress the Irish Catholics. I spend a minimum of three hours a day reading from multiple carefully cultivated sources. So, yeah, I stand by my assessment. Is that enough context?
I had been reading the Guardian, as well as the BBC, The Sun, The Independent, plus multiple other worldwide newspapers for decades. I stopped reading the Guardian about five years ago when it became clear they are a one trick pony. There is nothing neutral written in that paper; everything has an ultra progressive slant. I studiously avoid ANY publication that has an obvious agenda; why else would I be subscribing to substacks??? Does that not speak for itself? I don't need to list my reading material here to prove anything; but I will tell you that my last two books were a history of slavery in the U.S. written in 1872 by Henry Wilson; 3 volumes done; over 2400 pages; and the history of Ireland's conquest by England, going back to the Anglo Saxon and Norman conquests of the 1000's and the papal decree giving Ireland to England, including in detail the political and industrial tactics used by England and the Aristocracy to violently, culturally and financially oppress the Irish Catholics. I spend a minimum of three hours a day reading from multiple carefully cultivated sources. So, yeah, I stand by my assessment. Is that enough context?