The Free Press
This article is taken from The Free Press’s daily newsletter. To get the best of the news delivered to your inbox every morning, sign up here:
The warrior-king of X is fighting against censorship again, this time in the Supreme Court—of Brazil. The free speech absolutist has pitted himself against Judge Alexandre de Moraes, a man who claims to defend Brazilian democracy while throwing people in jail without trial.
It all started when the highest court in the South American country forced X to “block certain popular accounts in Brazil.” (X was prohibited from saying which accounts had been targeted, although de Moraes has a reputation for cracking down on far-right activity on social media.)
On Saturday evening, Elon Musk told the world in a tweet he’d be “lifting all restrictions,” saying the “judge has applied massive fines” and “threatened to arrest our employees.” It’s not clear which X workers are at risk—or what they might be charged with. But it’s since emerged that the “massive fines” equate to $20,000 per day for each reactivated account—not that the billionaire X CEO is bothered; he concluded his post: “Principles matter more than profit.”
On Sunday, de Moraes emerged—along with memes of him looking like Voldemort, in dark flowing robes and a cape. He blasted the X CEO for “obstruction of Brazilian justice,” “incitement of crime,” and waging a “disinformation campaign,” adding that he had opened an investigation into Musk.
Musk quickly bit back, promising to “do a full data dump”—to reveal which accounts the Brazilian government had asked X to ban, once the company gets “employees in Brazil to a safe place.”
In this standoff, we’re Team Elon. The tech billionaire is shining a light on something few Americans appreciate: that free speech is suffering in Latin America’s largest so-called democracy—and he’s standing up to a man infamous for using authoritarian powers to “protect” it. Glenn Greenwald, a journalist who tracks censorship in Brazil, where he lives, explained last January that de Moraes is known to have “almost unilateral, unchecked power to essentially order anyone to be banned from the internet that he wants.”
De Moraes doesn’t limit his animus to far-right influencers. “He’s ordered ten members of Congress to be completely silenced on the internet,” Greenwald wrote in the post, and “forced Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and every other one to remove them, even though they don’t judge them to be violating their terms of service.”
Meanwhile, American outlets have made their anti-Musk bias clear, especially Wired, which ran the headline, “Elon Musk Is Platforming Far-Right Activists in Brazil, Defying Court Order,” without mentioning Brazil’s dismal record on free speech.
That’s not to say Elon’s record on free speech is entirely pristine. He caved to pressure from both the Turkish and Indian governments to ban accounts on X. But how many other billionaires ever put principles before profit?
Musk’s latest post suggests he’s not backing down. He trolled the judge on Monday, topping it with a laughing face emoji: “How did Alexandre de Moraes become the dictator of Brazil?”
Rupa Subramanya is a writer for The Free Press. Read her piece “New Hate Speech Laws Threaten Freedom Across the West,” and follow her on X @rupasubramanya.
There can never be a ny justification to issue a blank check to those who hold power over the lives of others. A political body that censors its critics is hold no moral standing. Defending all actions on an open forum is the mark of a proper government. Thank you 'X'.
A few more observations:
I really didn't expect such an one-sided presentation from The Free Press. It is extremely problematic in this article that the author fails to provide any context for Alexandre de Moraes' actions, as they take place in the framework of an official investigation into years of digital militias attempting to stage coups and create a complete chaos of disinformation. Instead, the article portrays Moraes as an arbitrary judge motivated by excessive power and political interests, which is misleading. And the portrayal of Musk as a "warrior king" against censorship is, I'm afraid, borderline ridiculous: Musk didn't challenge China or India when they imposed conditions on him. He respected their laws to avoid losing markets. Now Musk feels comfortable playing his hand in Brazil because he has such a big hand there. He is deliberately entering the narrative battlefield in Brazil with the intention of creating an international perception that the current leftist government, which won democratically against a madman like Bolsonaro and de facto saved our democracy, is actually the authoritarian force, and that Lula and the progressives are "against freedom". This couldn't be further from the truth.