Your idiotic insistence that the sexual point of view of the scientist changes the science is typical of the woke word view, which posits everyone has their own truth, and there's no one scietific truth for everyone, regardless of sexual orientation. On this subject you are full of Schiff, and completely intolerant of traditional views o…
Your idiotic insistence that the sexual point of view of the scientist changes the science is typical of the woke word view, which posits everyone has their own truth, and there's no one scietific truth for everyone, regardless of sexual orientation. On this subject you are full of Schiff, and completely intolerant of traditional views of science and truth. The world wasn't invented yesterday for the benefit of 23 new sexual orientations. Scientific principles don't have to bend to accommodate trans sex. It can exist on it's own, without imposing impossible world views on the world. A trans woman ain't a biological woman. A chromosome check will show the difference in every cell native to the organism. I don't have to play make believe on a scientific level to tolerate whatever you want to do on your own behind closed doors. Insisting I have to accept your distorted view of reality ain't tolerance.
Bob Hope was asked one time if he was leaving California because they made gay marriage legal. He said he was leaving before they could make it mandatory.
There you go again...making assertions neither I or anyone else ever said and then attacking them. You invent falsehoods in order to have something to parry. Your entire first paragraph is a folly of invented statements all of your own making I have not said.
You said: " Insisting I have to accept your distorted view of reality ain't tolerance." I never said you have to accept my view or anyone else's. Where did you get that idea from? You invented it just to have something to parry. I have stated repeatedly that pluralism, the circumstance of having multiple ideas floating around simultaneously, is of preeminent importance. You can and should have your ideas, no matter that they are falsely attributed non-sequiturs.
BTW, you never told me what your "rice bowl" reference was -- you said: "Sorry if I broke your rice bowl." I think there's a tone of sarcasm in there; otherwise, I'm not sure how that non-sequitur fits in.
You also said: "I have lifelong friends that are gay. I have no hate for anyone," but then you make a quip about Bob Hope who made a defamatory and ludicrous remark about gay marriage. What's up, bro? It's a stupid joke that only jerks think is funny.
Your rice bowl, IOW your making a living, seems to depend on your sexual identity. Your misunderstanding of the joke shows you have no idea what you're arguing for.
Your insularity and ignorance is impenetrable. You ain't worth any more of my time.
Your idiotic insistence that the sexual point of view of the scientist changes the science is typical of the woke word view, which posits everyone has their own truth, and there's no one scietific truth for everyone, regardless of sexual orientation. On this subject you are full of Schiff, and completely intolerant of traditional views of science and truth. The world wasn't invented yesterday for the benefit of 23 new sexual orientations. Scientific principles don't have to bend to accommodate trans sex. It can exist on it's own, without imposing impossible world views on the world. A trans woman ain't a biological woman. A chromosome check will show the difference in every cell native to the organism. I don't have to play make believe on a scientific level to tolerate whatever you want to do on your own behind closed doors. Insisting I have to accept your distorted view of reality ain't tolerance.
Bob Hope was asked one time if he was leaving California because they made gay marriage legal. He said he was leaving before they could make it mandatory.
There you go again...making assertions neither I or anyone else ever said and then attacking them. You invent falsehoods in order to have something to parry. Your entire first paragraph is a folly of invented statements all of your own making I have not said.
You said: " Insisting I have to accept your distorted view of reality ain't tolerance." I never said you have to accept my view or anyone else's. Where did you get that idea from? You invented it just to have something to parry. I have stated repeatedly that pluralism, the circumstance of having multiple ideas floating around simultaneously, is of preeminent importance. You can and should have your ideas, no matter that they are falsely attributed non-sequiturs.
BTW, you never told me what your "rice bowl" reference was -- you said: "Sorry if I broke your rice bowl." I think there's a tone of sarcasm in there; otherwise, I'm not sure how that non-sequitur fits in.
You also said: "I have lifelong friends that are gay. I have no hate for anyone," but then you make a quip about Bob Hope who made a defamatory and ludicrous remark about gay marriage. What's up, bro? It's a stupid joke that only jerks think is funny.
Your rice bowl, IOW your making a living, seems to depend on your sexual identity. Your misunderstanding of the joke shows you have no idea what you're arguing for.
Your insularity and ignorance is impenetrable. You ain't worth any more of my time.
My sexual identity? Bitch, your talking to a cis-gender heterosexual white male whose armed to the teeth with privilege. On your knees.
All men (& women) are created equal.