I also have covered the impact of JFK's death here as well. I argue that his death was the turning point on so many levels in american history, but for one, it was the beginning of the "gaslight" for the american public because we begin to doubt what we saw with our own eyes:
I also have covered the impact of JFK's death here as well. I argue that his death was the turning point on so many levels in american history, but for one, it was the beginning of the "gaslight" for the american public because we begin to doubt what we saw with our own eyes:
I build upon this article and also discuss another pivotal event of that time period building on the conspiracy of JFK and touch on, MKUltra -- which was no conspiracy, but actual scientific studies that took place: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-success-of-mk-ultra#details
On a random SN: Kissinger? Good Guy? That's an interesting perspective....
It's interesting that Ken Kesey took part at Stanford in one aspect of MKUltra--it's discussed on his Wikipedia page--and at least one lifelong Deadhead I talked with believed that the whole acid culture of the 60's had the CIA's fingerprints all over it. He also made the interesting claim (to me at least) that the Grateful Dead shows constituted a many decades long act of performance art.
In my view, the hippies were right that a whole lot of the stories that are most interesting require deviating from the received version of the straight and narrow "consensus" (manufactured?) reality. Their particular problem is that, like the Communists, their habit of breaking social norms never made the omelet of a new and better coherent culture.
One sees them circling their wagons and shrinking in fear, now, from nearly everything. Where Woodstock happened during an arguably worse pandemic than COVID, now all those people and their children reliably clung to their masks, their experimental medicines, and their trust in a patently corrupt Establishment.
Opposites meet, as some clever person once noted. That is why the middle is a vastly healthier place to live. You don't get a dot or a sliver, but everything, if you take everything in moderation.
Sirhan Sirhan could have been a sick anarchist acting alone trying to make a name for himself (like Mark David Chapman) in the name of some warped ideology or religion.
The bullets that killed RFK were fired contact close into his back. Sirhan Sirhan was in the front. And more bullets were found in the room than his gun held.
This per his son, who has publicly named the person--who was part of his security detail--who murdered his father.
Would it be possible to have a Presidential candidate killed in such a way, and not have it show up in the autopsy? Yes. Definitely yes.
Thank You Theresa! I think this is an example of “conspiracy politics” that I study. Even though the narrative is “one” person, anyone with sense can see that is an outright lie.
But what happens when a government continually lies to its citizens? How can we then have true and factual systems if they’re built on lies?
These are the works I explore and hope to get your feedback on some of my work!
I also have covered the impact of JFK's death here as well. I argue that his death was the turning point on so many levels in american history, but for one, it was the beginning of the "gaslight" for the american public because we begin to doubt what we saw with our own eyes:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-jfk-conspiracy-how-the-assassination
I build upon this article and also discuss another pivotal event of that time period building on the conspiracy of JFK and touch on, MKUltra -- which was no conspiracy, but actual scientific studies that took place: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-success-of-mk-ultra#details
On a random SN: Kissinger? Good Guy? That's an interesting perspective....
It's interesting that Ken Kesey took part at Stanford in one aspect of MKUltra--it's discussed on his Wikipedia page--and at least one lifelong Deadhead I talked with believed that the whole acid culture of the 60's had the CIA's fingerprints all over it. He also made the interesting claim (to me at least) that the Grateful Dead shows constituted a many decades long act of performance art.
In my view, the hippies were right that a whole lot of the stories that are most interesting require deviating from the received version of the straight and narrow "consensus" (manufactured?) reality. Their particular problem is that, like the Communists, their habit of breaking social norms never made the omelet of a new and better coherent culture.
One sees them circling their wagons and shrinking in fear, now, from nearly everything. Where Woodstock happened during an arguably worse pandemic than COVID, now all those people and their children reliably clung to their masks, their experimental medicines, and their trust in a patently corrupt Establishment.
Opposites meet, as some clever person once noted. That is why the middle is a vastly healthier place to live. You don't get a dot or a sliver, but everything, if you take everything in moderation.
President Kennedy and his brother were most assuredly planned assassinations and most certainly not done by 1 or 2 men.
I agree with you about JFK. RFK not so much.
Sirhan Sirhan could have been a sick anarchist acting alone trying to make a name for himself (like Mark David Chapman) in the name of some warped ideology or religion.
The bullets that killed RFK were fired contact close into his back. Sirhan Sirhan was in the front. And more bullets were found in the room than his gun held.
This per his son, who has publicly named the person--who was part of his security detail--who murdered his father.
Would it be possible to have a Presidential candidate killed in such a way, and not have it show up in the autopsy? Yes. Definitely yes.
It was Palestinian nationalism.
I have always found it very curious how Sirhan's motives were glossed over. I do not know what they were, but wouldn't a peek have been in order?
Thank You Theresa! I think this is an example of “conspiracy politics” that I study. Even though the narrative is “one” person, anyone with sense can see that is an outright lie.
But what happens when a government continually lies to its citizens? How can we then have true and factual systems if they’re built on lies?
These are the works I explore and hope to get your feedback on some of my work!