120 Comments

The chicks are sitting very well these days. They are dominating education and dominate most of the growing industries... they have Title-9 benefits... they can vote (ha!)... society is cool with equal pay for equal work... there are copious laws on the books to prevent gender discrimination... they have #MeToo media mob power to destroy any male that looks at them the wrong way.

And the dudes (other than the manbun-wearing low-T fake laptop job types) are not sitting very well. Their college enrolment has fallen. Their economic prospects have been depleted by globalism. They have fewer academic paths including fewer in athletics as the law has forced budgets to be spent on female sports like underwater basket weaving. The get their lives destroyed by the #MeToo mob failing to control their biological sexual impulses indicating their interest to couple with females.

And for this we get to continue to see females march in resentment and rage that they deserve more and men deserve less.

Seems to me a big pile of female greed.

And this is a big reason why Trump and the Republicans won. Not only did males vote to say they had enough, but so did a lot of females noting the selfish behavior of their gender class and rejecting it.

Expand full comment

The most brilliant move by the Dems was offering free abortions and vasectomies at the DNC convention: removing the party's most loyal members from the gene pool. What if we could get both parties to do that!

Expand full comment

I watched, with profound sorrow, young woman crying and agonizing over Trump's victory. They were actually afraid that their life's were in danger. Why would they think that? I wish someone could explain that to me.

Expand full comment

because the believe the bs fed to them by lunatics , there is plenty of if Trump wins gays and trans will be targets

Expand full comment

The last sentence nailed it.

Expand full comment

Anyone who uses the phrase "reproductive rights" is accepting the progressive world view. When you use those words you are accepting their spin. But it's a totally misleading neologism. What it actually refers to is the opposite of what it says. It refers to women who DON'T want to reproduce. It refers to the belief that women should be able to behave as promiscuously as men with no consequences, even though the two sexes have completely different biology, and only women get pregnant. This reality imposes (or it should impose) different responsibilities on men and women, but progressives deny that. "Reproductive rights" is an ugly pernicious neologism, although a very successful one. Journalists who use it are guilty of malpractice.

Expand full comment

Like “gender-affirming care.”

Expand full comment

The Dems not only chose the wrong issue; they picked the wrong candidate. Kamala Harris was not chosen as VP for her competency and throughout her term she's proved that she is not competent. Though her favorite phrase is "let me be clear", she was anything but. Her communication skills and flip-flopping particularly terrified me for her involvement in foreign policy as president. I voted against Harris. Had Democrats produced a better candidate, the outcome might have been different.

Expand full comment

Joe Rogan just killed the legacy media this week. Hands down and full stop.

Expand full comment

Well done! More please.

Expand full comment

Pretty weak follow-up, TFP. Besides, the show's over, nobody cares.

Expand full comment

River Page -- What are you, a TV and movie actor? Top billing? We don't care about no stinking "top billing." Besides, Dana White was more "5th co-star," but he did get a "separate card," I'll give you that. Learn the business, River, or you might not last long. More "besides" -- the show I saw, Melania Trump got "top billing."

Expand full comment

I'm just here for the roast.

Pissed off cat ladies, and howling harpies, let it rip.

Now that the rest of us are unburdened from what has been. JOY.....

Expand full comment

A great paradox of our moment: In our society, educated women have never been so powerful. In our politics, educated women have just been crushed by the most ludicrously macho man in our public history, supported by more women against a woman than he was when he ran against a man.

Expand full comment

Why does the left invent terms, like “reproductive health” that mean the opposite of what they use them to mean? Reproductive health sounds like an ability to successfully carry and delivery a baby. But of course it means the freedom to kill a baby in utero. Nice sounding euphemisms don’t fool any thinking person. The fact that they don’t use accurate terms like “abortion freedom” suggests they know it’s a turnoff. Instead of marching with placards with drawings of uteruses, why not show dismembered babies? That’s what they actually want.

My view of abortion is based on the horror of the procedure that produces those dismembered tiny bodies. Would they do that to cats?

If you must, use the pill procedure. But if you wait too long, would you want to be shown those baby body parts?

Expand full comment

I would be fine if a few of my tax dollars went to a fund that provided free contraception with no catches to anyone who wants it.

Expand full comment

there is free contraception take it up the ass (good enough for gays ) or close your legs

Expand full comment

It was clear that Harris could not endure a three hour conversation with Joe Rogan. The format is simple; face to face with laughter resulting from wit rather than deflection.

Expand full comment

"Democrats Picked the Wrong Women’s Rights Issue" Yup.

"Joe Biden: the first trans-activist president

The outgoing president sacrificed women’s rights and children’s safety at the altar of gender ideology."

https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/11/05/joe-biden-the-first-trans-activist-president/

"The trans issue has grabbed the US electorate by the genitals. In the pre-election period, Republicans have reportedly spent more than $65million on television ads highlighting the madness of the Democratic Party’s push for ‘trans inclusion’. And who can blame them? Sane Americans would surely struggle to vote for a party that has championed dangerous puberty-blocking drugs for children, invited trans flashers to the White House and housed male rapists in women’s prisons. And what all-American sports fan wants to see men run, cycle or swim off with trophies meant for women?"

etc.

Expand full comment

You give me a strong woman like Margaret Thatcher to run for president, and I'll vote for her in a heartbeat. Give me a cackling ignorant indecisive shape-shifting lying empty vessel woman like Kamala, and I'll vote for anybody else. ANYBODY!

Expand full comment

100%

Expand full comment

Tulsi Gabbard 2028?

Expand full comment

There are not going to be any more elections. Remember?

Expand full comment

Well then what am I going to do with all these boxes of fake mail-in ballots I have stacked up in the garage?

Expand full comment