I hope Peter (and Bari) carefully read the comments. Readers have overwhelmingly weighed in with a simple and obvious conclusion: the article is totally devoid of any factual evidence to support the argument being made. Above all, I am disappointed at the editors at FP for allowing this slipshod and irresponsibly written article through the editorial process. Shame....
I hope Peter (and Bari) carefully read the comments. Readers have overwhelmingly weighed in with a simple and obvious conclusion: the article is totally devoid of any factual evidence to support the argument being made. Above all, I am disappointed at the editors at FP for allowing this slipshod and irresponsibly written article through the editorial process. Shame....
I hope Peter (and Bari) carefully read the comments. Readers have overwhelmingly weighed in with a simple and obvious conclusion: the article is totally devoid of any factual evidence to support the argument being made. Above all, I am disappointed at the editors at FP for allowing this slipshod and irresponsibly written article through the editorial process. Shame....