I am not convinced, for I agree with Len Metters that to convince me there is something of interest here requires review of the facts of the original case and a history of appeals. Instead, this is atypical of TFP (in lack of facts) and more like the empty-shell talk we get from leftist propagandists (hoping for an emotional hook to set …
I am not convinced, for I agree with Len Metters that to convince me there is something of interest here requires review of the facts of the original case and a history of appeals. Instead, this is atypical of TFP (in lack of facts) and more like the empty-shell talk we get from leftist propagandists (hoping for an emotional hook to set in our mouths). Some felons should be executed, because some contribute to making prison an inhumane experience for other prisoners, and because incarcerating some of them is useless for the public.
I agree. The arguments being made here are defense arguments, not stunning revelations of previously unknown facts. Many, many competent people have reviewed all of this and haven't felt compelled to challenge the jury's decision.
I am not convinced, for I agree with Len Metters that to convince me there is something of interest here requires review of the facts of the original case and a history of appeals. Instead, this is atypical of TFP (in lack of facts) and more like the empty-shell talk we get from leftist propagandists (hoping for an emotional hook to set in our mouths). Some felons should be executed, because some contribute to making prison an inhumane experience for other prisoners, and because incarcerating some of them is useless for the public.
I agree. The arguments being made here are defense arguments, not stunning revelations of previously unknown facts. Many, many competent people have reviewed all of this and haven't felt compelled to challenge the jury's decision.