Porn addiction is absolutely real. You can get addicted to anything that hijacks your dopamine receptors, which is how people get addicted to carbs and smartphones. Stop making excuses for porn. My ex-boyfriends were so ruined by porn that they all eventually confessed that they were unable to feel attraction towards m…
Porn addiction is absolutely real. You can get addicted to anything that hijacks your dopamine receptors, which is how people get addicted to carbs and smartphones. Stop making excuses for porn. My ex-boyfriends were so ruined by porn that they all eventually confessed that they were unable to feel attraction towards me because they only wanted to jerk off to videos. It's horrible.
That's exactly why I think Rob Henderson is being really pathetic and underhanded. Instead of addressing these issues and coming up with solutions he's whining about how women need commit because otherwise we'll lose males.... to VR porn. He's advertising for pornography and trying to intimidate women into forming half hearted "relationships" with addicts. He might as well demand we sleep with coke users.
Rob is essentially right that women acting in their perceived short-term interests produces disastrous outcomes for everyone, and they would be well advised to do what men have always done and learn to resist our baser urges and-as he puts it-settle.
Your lack of insight is unfortunate, but not something I feel compelled to make any further effort to remedy. Try to have an open mind.
"Please please please please have sex with me! I'll become a porn addict and waste my life fapping to VR if you don't! It's all your fault that I'm depressed and lie on polls and surveys!"
Selfish, short sighted, and lying about the emotional problems that males face. This is pathetic.
The emotional problems that men face are often caused by abusive behavior like what you’re displaying. Fortunately, I’m not affected by it as much as other people you may have harmed.
Neither Rob nor I is begging any woman to have sex with us personally. Quite the contrary.
You're trying to cover up porn addiction becsuse you're trying to pass responsibility off of addicts unfit for human relationships. You are doing this because you want to scapegoat someone for your problems, in this case me. (Don't forget that you barged in here making pathetic excuses.) Now that someone has caught on to your game you're trying to label it "abuse" so that you can cry victim.
You aren't any different from a drug dealer except you're pimping a different dopamine hijacker. Go bother someone else if you want to snivel and whine about how persecuted you are.
I’m not persecuted, mainly because the people trying (like you) have failed.
I have no desire to cover up anything; “porn addiction” is a diversion from societal failures that actually destroy relationships. There are problems in education, in employment, in the justice system, in the media, etc. Considering people whose lives have been destroyed as “porn addicts” is demeaning to their actual struggles.
This is the most disgustingly leftist victimhood narrative I have seen in a long time. Are you going to set up a porn distribution center so that addicts can use safely, like "harm reduction" sites in San Fran handing out clean needles to shoot up with? Denying porn's effects on the brain is like denying cocaine's effects on your brain. Sure, it stems out of emotional and psychological problems but denying addiction is evil and disgusting.
Good luck with whatever porn scam you're running, I hope the money you get out of stealing money from lonely males is enough to make up for the lives you want to ruin.
I'm not running any porn scam, but I certainly support anyone who makes the decision to utilize pornography (which is largely free) to either supplement or replace a relationship situation that does not meet their needs.
And I am ideologically left-leaning, but not "woke", which leaves me in a position to see the ideological derangement which has affected women more than men and has had disastrous effects on normal human relationships.
I don't blame anyone who wants to opt out. We're all victims of the prevailing ideology, and it's up to individuals to resist it in order to live a better life.
If you're denying addiction exists then you are "woke" by definition. You are part of the same reality-denying school as jail abolitionists and Antifa. The fact that your take is gentrified to "porn addiction doesn't exist" does not absolve you of your refusal to acknowledge reality.
If anyone wants to opt out, then they can. Just like the meth addicts in San Francisco opt out by shooting up in their tents and crapping in the streets. But since they're using a synthetic alternative to self respect then we don't need to hold them accountable for their actions, it was obviously the evil feminists that drove them insane and forced them to shoot up.
This is the average leftist: nothing is ever our fault, we're just bystanders in our own lives and everything can be attributed to someone else victimizing us. Got it.
Addiction exists. Porn addiction does not. Not everything is an addiction.
It is common for social conservatives to attempt to demonize forms of social progress that reduce their privilege.
The addicts in San Fransisco are not being benefited by policies that infantilize them, but American drug policy is largely the opposite of what more left-leaning countries have done.
I understand that this stuff is devastating to accept but you and Rob's refusal to face this does not make the reality go away. And it doesn't absolve you of your pimp behavior or how Rob thinks that he can use this shit as a cudgel to get women to have sex with unsuitable men. I am not the right person to break this to you but women refusing to settle to addicts does not reduce our privilege; it expands it because we don't have manbabies to care for once we reject the "best and brightest" that are too fragile to interact with anything more complicated than VR.
Left leaning countries like Europe have completely different drug policies than ours. We are still suffering the hangover from Nancy Reagan's farcical attempts at stopping the CIA induced crack epidemic.
https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/
Porn addiction is absolutely real. You can get addicted to anything that hijacks your dopamine receptors, which is how people get addicted to carbs and smartphones. Stop making excuses for porn. My ex-boyfriends were so ruined by porn that they all eventually confessed that they were unable to feel attraction towards me because they only wanted to jerk off to videos. It's horrible.
That's exactly why I think Rob Henderson is being really pathetic and underhanded. Instead of addressing these issues and coming up with solutions he's whining about how women need commit because otherwise we'll lose males.... to VR porn. He's advertising for pornography and trying to intimidate women into forming half hearted "relationships" with addicts. He might as well demand we sleep with coke users.
I have you figured down to the letter.
Rob is essentially right that women acting in their perceived short-term interests produces disastrous outcomes for everyone, and they would be well advised to do what men have always done and learn to resist our baser urges and-as he puts it-settle.
Your lack of insight is unfortunate, but not something I feel compelled to make any further effort to remedy. Try to have an open mind.
"Please please please please have sex with me! I'll become a porn addict and waste my life fapping to VR if you don't! It's all your fault that I'm depressed and lie on polls and surveys!"
Selfish, short sighted, and lying about the emotional problems that males face. This is pathetic.
The emotional problems that men face are often caused by abusive behavior like what you’re displaying. Fortunately, I’m not affected by it as much as other people you may have harmed.
Neither Rob nor I is begging any woman to have sex with us personally. Quite the contrary.
You're trying to cover up porn addiction becsuse you're trying to pass responsibility off of addicts unfit for human relationships. You are doing this because you want to scapegoat someone for your problems, in this case me. (Don't forget that you barged in here making pathetic excuses.) Now that someone has caught on to your game you're trying to label it "abuse" so that you can cry victim.
You aren't any different from a drug dealer except you're pimping a different dopamine hijacker. Go bother someone else if you want to snivel and whine about how persecuted you are.
I’m not persecuted, mainly because the people trying (like you) have failed.
I have no desire to cover up anything; “porn addiction” is a diversion from societal failures that actually destroy relationships. There are problems in education, in employment, in the justice system, in the media, etc. Considering people whose lives have been destroyed as “porn addicts” is demeaning to their actual struggles.
This is the most disgustingly leftist victimhood narrative I have seen in a long time. Are you going to set up a porn distribution center so that addicts can use safely, like "harm reduction" sites in San Fran handing out clean needles to shoot up with? Denying porn's effects on the brain is like denying cocaine's effects on your brain. Sure, it stems out of emotional and psychological problems but denying addiction is evil and disgusting.
Good luck with whatever porn scam you're running, I hope the money you get out of stealing money from lonely males is enough to make up for the lives you want to ruin.
I'm not running any porn scam, but I certainly support anyone who makes the decision to utilize pornography (which is largely free) to either supplement or replace a relationship situation that does not meet their needs.
And I am ideologically left-leaning, but not "woke", which leaves me in a position to see the ideological derangement which has affected women more than men and has had disastrous effects on normal human relationships.
I don't blame anyone who wants to opt out. We're all victims of the prevailing ideology, and it's up to individuals to resist it in order to live a better life.
If you're denying addiction exists then you are "woke" by definition. You are part of the same reality-denying school as jail abolitionists and Antifa. The fact that your take is gentrified to "porn addiction doesn't exist" does not absolve you of your refusal to acknowledge reality.
If anyone wants to opt out, then they can. Just like the meth addicts in San Francisco opt out by shooting up in their tents and crapping in the streets. But since they're using a synthetic alternative to self respect then we don't need to hold them accountable for their actions, it was obviously the evil feminists that drove them insane and forced them to shoot up.
This is the average leftist: nothing is ever our fault, we're just bystanders in our own lives and everything can be attributed to someone else victimizing us. Got it.
Addiction exists. Porn addiction does not. Not everything is an addiction.
It is common for social conservatives to attempt to demonize forms of social progress that reduce their privilege.
The addicts in San Fransisco are not being benefited by policies that infantilize them, but American drug policy is largely the opposite of what more left-leaning countries have done.
Porn addiction is a known behavior that is being studied as a medical condition: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4600144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050060/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hbm.23447#publication-history
I understand that this stuff is devastating to accept but you and Rob's refusal to face this does not make the reality go away. And it doesn't absolve you of your pimp behavior or how Rob thinks that he can use this shit as a cudgel to get women to have sex with unsuitable men. I am not the right person to break this to you but women refusing to settle to addicts does not reduce our privilege; it expands it because we don't have manbabies to care for once we reject the "best and brightest" that are too fragile to interact with anything more complicated than VR.
Left leaning countries like Europe have completely different drug policies than ours. We are still suffering the hangover from Nancy Reagan's farcical attempts at stopping the CIA induced crack epidemic.