I commented on this article yesterday but that was before i read Bove’s response. Totally rebutted all her points. Truly disappointed in the FP. Same old MSM. Danielle is consistent with a long line subversive DOJ employees. She actually thought Pam Bondi would meet with her, must have thought it was”worse than Watergate”. This woman has never heard NO. Get over yourself
I commented on this article yesterday but that was before i read Bove’s response. Totally rebutted all her points. Truly disappointed in the FP. Same old MSM. Danielle is consistent with a long line subversive DOJ employees. She actually thought Pam Bondi would meet with her, must have thought it was”worse than Watergate”. This woman has never heard NO. Get over yourself
I commented on this article yesterday but that was before i read Bove’s response. Totally rebutted all her points. Truly disappointed in the FP. Same old MSM. Danielle is consistent with a long line subversive DOJ employees. She actually thought Pam Bondi would meet with her, must have thought it was”worse than Watergate”. This woman has never heard NO. Get over yourself