The very gist of this article - that the Daniel Penney case is a Rorschach test - is absurd. It's not simply about "depending on who you ask." The salient facts of this case are not in doubt, and they show convincingly that this was self-defense. The both-sides-ism of this article is deeply disappointing.
The very gist of this article - that the Daniel Penney case is a Rorschach test - is absurd. It's not simply about "depending on who you ask." The salient facts of this case are not in doubt, and they show convincingly that this was self-defense. The both-sides-ism of this article is deeply disappointing.
The very gist of this article - that the Daniel Penney case is a Rorschach test - is absurd. It's not simply about "depending on who you ask." The salient facts of this case are not in doubt, and they show convincingly that this was self-defense. The both-sides-ism of this article is deeply disappointing.