Well, Stacey, an ad hominem attack is one that expresses a personal insult, like "horrible, racist and self serving" and "grifter". Ringing any bells, Stacey? In contrast, a reasoned argument addresses the substance of the actions. Can you muster an argument or prefer to spew? As for the "unqualified" appointment to the Supreme Court, wo…
Well, Stacey, an ad hominem attack is one that expresses a personal insult, like "horrible, racist and self serving" and "grifter". Ringing any bells, Stacey? In contrast, a reasoned argument addresses the substance of the actions. Can you muster an argument or prefer to spew? As for the "unqualified" appointment to the Supreme Court, would you be able to state who that was in what way they were unqualified? People suffering from TDS are prone to insulting rants and you passed the test with flying colors.
Well, Stacey, an ad hominem attack is one that expresses a personal insult, like "horrible, racist and self serving" and "grifter". Ringing any bells, Stacey? In contrast, a reasoned argument addresses the substance of the actions. Can you muster an argument or prefer to spew? As for the "unqualified" appointment to the Supreme Court, would you be able to state who that was in what way they were unqualified? People suffering from TDS are prone to insulting rants and you passed the test with flying colors.