I first began to doubt the legitimacy of scientific "research" when coming across the work of Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, who encountered enormous resistance from Michael Mann et al. when seeking to see the data that Mann used in creating his "hockey stick graph". It is so evident that scientists just assume that we will take thei…
I first began to doubt the legitimacy of scientific "research" when coming across the work of Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, who encountered enormous resistance from Michael Mann et al. when seeking to see the data that Mann used in creating his "hockey stick graph". It is so evident that scientists just assume that we will take their word for it, and so the notion of rigor has fallen behind getting published (and making headlines). I want to trust scientists, we NEED to be able to trust scientists, but climate "scientists" and now epidemiologists are doing everything they can to actually destroy that trust.
I first began to doubt the legitimacy of scientific "research" when coming across the work of Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, who encountered enormous resistance from Michael Mann et al. when seeking to see the data that Mann used in creating his "hockey stick graph". It is so evident that scientists just assume that we will take their word for it, and so the notion of rigor has fallen behind getting published (and making headlines). I want to trust scientists, we NEED to be able to trust scientists, but climate "scientists" and now epidemiologists are doing everything they can to actually destroy that trust.