I dissent. This was not good coverage of this event.
It is often beneficial to send a disengaged “man from Mars” to impartially observe a phenomenon to glean unbiased coverage. But I challenge the notion that an observer who self-admittedly has zero exposure to religious or spiritual movements can provide a deep understanding of the expe…
I dissent. This was not good coverage of this event.
It is often beneficial to send a disengaged “man from Mars” to impartially observe a phenomenon to glean unbiased coverage. But I challenge the notion that an observer who self-admittedly has zero exposure to religious or spiritual movements can provide a deep understanding of the experience.
Objectivity and ignorance of the subject matter are not the same thing.
I dissent. This was not good coverage of this event.
It is often beneficial to send a disengaged “man from Mars” to impartially observe a phenomenon to glean unbiased coverage. But I challenge the notion that an observer who self-admittedly has zero exposure to religious or spiritual movements can provide a deep understanding of the experience.
Objectivity and ignorance of the subject matter are not the same thing.
Have to agree. I attended this school and grew up in this town, and I know better.