To be triggered by such a true statement: "We fear speaking truth, because now, unfortunately, truth is in the minority. Congress just passed a bill where stating something as basic as the biblical teaching of who killed Jesus could land you in jail." is to me, stunning. This is a statement of simply reciting a historical event and the b…
To be triggered by such a true statement: "We fear speaking truth, because now, unfortunately, truth is in the minority. Congress just passed a bill where stating something as basic as the biblical teaching of who killed Jesus could land you in jail." is to me, stunning. This is a statement of simply reciting a historical event and the bill could make this illegal. It is not an expression of antisemitism but a condemnation on a very bad law.
The bill is unconstitutional as hell and I am ashamed it passed with beyond a super-majority.
Then to write: "he suggested the women were probably looking forward more to marriage and children than to high-powered careers." is evidence Kat didn't even listen to the speech (or did so with only extreme hatred)
To be triggered by such a true statement: "We fear speaking truth, because now, unfortunately, truth is in the minority. Congress just passed a bill where stating something as basic as the biblical teaching of who killed Jesus could land you in jail." is to me, stunning. This is a statement of simply reciting a historical event and the bill could make this illegal. It is not an expression of antisemitism but a condemnation on a very bad law.
The bill is unconstitutional as hell and I am ashamed it passed with beyond a super-majority.
Then to write: "he suggested the women were probably looking forward more to marriage and children than to high-powered careers." is evidence Kat didn't even listen to the speech (or did so with only extreme hatred)