This Title IX abuse is just another extension of The Abuse Industry. It will end up doing extensive damage colleges long-term. However, before that occurs, significant lifelong damage to the falsely accused victims will harm so many lives. It is a bully pulpit not a legal process.
False abuse claims for child abuse and domestic viol…
This Title IX abuse is just another extension of The Abuse Industry. It will end up doing extensive damage colleges long-term. However, before that occurs, significant lifelong damage to the falsely accused victims will harm so many lives. It is a bully pulpit not a legal process.
False abuse claims for child abuse and domestic violence exploded matrimonial law revenue over the last 25 years. Everyone is against domestic violence, as everyone is against campus sexual assaults. So why do Democrats, the architects of the Violence Against Women Act, find the most reprehensible way to find facts in serious cases? Why are they hell bent on absolutes instead of due process? The answer, I think, is money and 'owning' a political issue.
Child abuse or domestic abuse reporting. An anonymous tip line, that is investigated by social workers who make recommendations. Cases get rarely get investigated by a real police officer/detective. However, they have been prevalent in contested custody cases for 25 years now. Accusers' names are masked, except the court system/judges are aware that one parent has a 'complaint' that has been vetted by an unqualified investigator (a social worker) and then you have a real legal battle on your hand. Funny that the judge knowing is not part of due process in many custody battles. Monies raised in abuse charities are than free to be accessed in custody cases. Monies that otherwise would not be able to be accessed. Money that attorney's helped raise for the same charities. Money spent that would upset a bunch of well-intentioned donors if they knew the actual use. It's a closed open secret in the family law industry. I'm so glad Effe brought this aspect up in Title IX and the fact it is a giant money-making opportunity. It is so wrong to create a conflict in the solution of sexual assaults and child abuse.
Think I'm full of it? Go look up some local family law attorneys, look on their bios and see if they have their own Domestic Abuse charity, or if they affiliate/volunteer themselves with an abuse charity. Where do you think all the money raised goes too? How do custody cases go on for years- who pays for it? Yes, a bunch of it goes to legitimate victims and their needs, which is absolutely fantastic. It's how it should be. Unfortunately, ill written abuse laws like this Title IX pile of crap, have a way of creating a bastardized legal industry instead of helping a victim. In custody cases a bunch of the abuse dollars, help feed the multi-billion-dollar family law industry. An industry that wreaks havoc on over 1 million non-custodial parents and their children each year. Custody is awarded temporarily after a claim. The accused then has to battle for their parental rights against non-profit dollars for their rights. It's either that explanation or that or that parent is one of the hordes of 'wealthy people' that make up non-custody batte (that last comment was very cynical). Bankrupting people, separating patents from kids, and all the while rewarding bad actors. It's not just attorneys & judges.
Police also can affirm how often the 'abuse' card is attempted to be used in a vindictive form. They are the only players in domestic violence who apply due process in such serious accused cases. Once due process and multi person investigation techniques are applied the abuse claim if false, usually disappears.
However, the CDC does not even attempt to measure how often initial claims are false. They only report admitted claims. Meaning claims that have been vetted by formal investigation. This conflates abuse data by omitting initial screened out claims. More than half of abuse claims are screened out without investigations, but again this data is segregated by the CDC, because it is a cash cow for healthcare and social services.
It's funny that the abuse industry professionals cannot admit to this or fix it. Their own very real form of abuse, with a whole new batch of victims that are a falsely accused or the child of a falsely accused parent, or a child who is coerced to accuse another parent. It's happening every day. So yes, very disgusted with a Title IX repeat of early mistakes in combating abuse.
This Title IX abuse is just another extension of The Abuse Industry. It will end up doing extensive damage colleges long-term. However, before that occurs, significant lifelong damage to the falsely accused victims will harm so many lives. It is a bully pulpit not a legal process.
False abuse claims for child abuse and domestic violence exploded matrimonial law revenue over the last 25 years. Everyone is against domestic violence, as everyone is against campus sexual assaults. So why do Democrats, the architects of the Violence Against Women Act, find the most reprehensible way to find facts in serious cases? Why are they hell bent on absolutes instead of due process? The answer, I think, is money and 'owning' a political issue.
Child abuse or domestic abuse reporting. An anonymous tip line, that is investigated by social workers who make recommendations. Cases get rarely get investigated by a real police officer/detective. However, they have been prevalent in contested custody cases for 25 years now. Accusers' names are masked, except the court system/judges are aware that one parent has a 'complaint' that has been vetted by an unqualified investigator (a social worker) and then you have a real legal battle on your hand. Funny that the judge knowing is not part of due process in many custody battles. Monies raised in abuse charities are than free to be accessed in custody cases. Monies that otherwise would not be able to be accessed. Money that attorney's helped raise for the same charities. Money spent that would upset a bunch of well-intentioned donors if they knew the actual use. It's a closed open secret in the family law industry. I'm so glad Effe brought this aspect up in Title IX and the fact it is a giant money-making opportunity. It is so wrong to create a conflict in the solution of sexual assaults and child abuse.
Think I'm full of it? Go look up some local family law attorneys, look on their bios and see if they have their own Domestic Abuse charity, or if they affiliate/volunteer themselves with an abuse charity. Where do you think all the money raised goes too? How do custody cases go on for years- who pays for it? Yes, a bunch of it goes to legitimate victims and their needs, which is absolutely fantastic. It's how it should be. Unfortunately, ill written abuse laws like this Title IX pile of crap, have a way of creating a bastardized legal industry instead of helping a victim. In custody cases a bunch of the abuse dollars, help feed the multi-billion-dollar family law industry. An industry that wreaks havoc on over 1 million non-custodial parents and their children each year. Custody is awarded temporarily after a claim. The accused then has to battle for their parental rights against non-profit dollars for their rights. It's either that explanation or that or that parent is one of the hordes of 'wealthy people' that make up non-custody batte (that last comment was very cynical). Bankrupting people, separating patents from kids, and all the while rewarding bad actors. It's not just attorneys & judges.
Police also can affirm how often the 'abuse' card is attempted to be used in a vindictive form. They are the only players in domestic violence who apply due process in such serious accused cases. Once due process and multi person investigation techniques are applied the abuse claim if false, usually disappears.
However, the CDC does not even attempt to measure how often initial claims are false. They only report admitted claims. Meaning claims that have been vetted by formal investigation. This conflates abuse data by omitting initial screened out claims. More than half of abuse claims are screened out without investigations, but again this data is segregated by the CDC, because it is a cash cow for healthcare and social services.
It's funny that the abuse industry professionals cannot admit to this or fix it. Their own very real form of abuse, with a whole new batch of victims that are a falsely accused or the child of a falsely accused parent, or a child who is coerced to accuse another parent. It's happening every day. So yes, very disgusted with a Title IX repeat of early mistakes in combating abuse.