A few weeks ago, fresh from being knighted by King Charles, historian Sir Niall Ferguson officially joined The Free Press as a columnist. His first piece was rather provocatively called “We’re All Soviets Now.” He argued why he thinks today’s United States resembles the decaying Soviet Union of the ’70s and ’80s. We’re physically unwell, heavily in debt, run by an out-of-touch gerontocracy, and subjected to a bogus ideology pushed by elites.
This was published before the disastrous presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Since then, Niall has only doubled down. He argued in his most recent column that the reason our system only offers up an embarrassing blowhard and a senile old man lies in contemporary America’s similarities to the Soviet Union in the 1980s.
Unsurprisingly, these provocative arguments drove some people crazy. We’d scarcely updated the homepage with that first column before the rebuttals came pouring in. But none were quite as passionate and thorough as the one written by Dispatch editor-in-chief Jonah Goldberg, who devoted an entire column to pushing back on Ferguson. In “No, We Are Not Living in ‘Late Soviet America,’ ” Goldberg conceded some of the basic facts presented by Ferguson, but aggressively objected to the idea that the United States was in any way similar to late-stage Soviet communism. “Do we have problems that have some superficial similarities with the Soviets? Sure. But. . . come on.” Goldberg continued: “The Soviet Union built a wall to keep its subjects trapped inside their evil empire. Many Americans understandably believe we need a wall to keep millions of people desperate to live here out.” Because at the end of the day, Goldberg argued, “America is simply not like the Soviet Union.”
Ferguson fought back on Twitter in an 18-part thread, in which he accused Goldberg of “pure cope.” And back and forth they went for days.
We’re happy to announce that they agreed to hash it all out on this very podcast. . . today.
The debate we ended up having was much bigger than merely whether the U.S. can accurately be compared to the USSR. It got to the heart of a core disagreement on the right in recent years about the health of American democracy—and whether the nation is still exceptional, albeit flawed, or if the country is in a state of inexorable decline.
It’s a fitting conversation to have right after the Fourth of July and as pundits and politicians fill airtime and columns with questions about our leader’s fitness for the job, presidential transparency, and whether it’s undemocratic to replace Biden on the election ticket. Because today’s conversation gets to the heart of how the American project is faring, and what we should do to save the country we all love before it’s too late.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Ever fall in love with an analogy? I mean Fall in Love. You lie awake at night, yearning for its touch, craving its essence.
But it's all wrong for you. It doesn't quite fit. in a sober moment, you realize that when you were knighted, perhaps the swing of the blade was akilter (after all, KC3 is also a septuagenarian) and maybe what you're feeling is the lingering effect of a concussion.
Goldberg 1, Ferguson 0. Masterful takedown there. We got problems, but not really those problems.
Ferguson simply can't show sufficient comparisons and Goldberg keeps pointing that out. No one is saying there aren't problems but I was surprised how evasive and strawmanny Ferguson was throughout the debate. The issues is whether we are living in late Soviet America and it seems the answer was definitively "no" for many well articulated reasons by Goldberg. The problems are very real, the enemies are obvious, but the comparison is very stretched despite Ferguson clinging to it.