A lot of people underestimate Democrats' ability to make their opponents look bad. They have institutional dominance far beyond what they admit having. They fabricate, they distort, they selectively edit, and they ambush.
The best candidate in the world looks like a monster under their airbrushing, and anyone who is actually that good is …
A lot of people underestimate Democrats' ability to make their opponents look bad. They have institutional dominance far beyond what they admit having. They fabricate, they distort, they selectively edit, and they ambush.
The best candidate in the world looks like a monster under their airbrushing, and anyone who is actually that good is smart enough not to run under these circumstances. That leaves someone dogged enough to bull-rush forward in spite of the Democrats, and the candidate we have is Donald Trump.
We don't need him to do much of anything right; we just need him to take a wrecking ball to the establishment as described by Tulsi Gabbard early in this interview:
A lot of people underestimate Democrats' ability to make their opponents look bad. They have institutional dominance far beyond what they admit having. They fabricate, they distort, they selectively edit, and they ambush.
The best candidate in the world looks like a monster under their airbrushing, and anyone who is actually that good is smart enough not to run under these circumstances. That leaves someone dogged enough to bull-rush forward in spite of the Democrats, and the candidate we have is Donald Trump.
We don't need him to do much of anything right; we just need him to take a wrecking ball to the establishment as described by Tulsi Gabbard early in this interview:
https://principlesvstribes.substack.com/p/tulsi-gabbard-brings-it-home