The judge has ruled that Baldwin's role as Executive Producer is irrelevant and isn't to be mentioned at trial. I don't agree but it's not an irrational ruling.
The judge has ruled that Baldwin's role as Executive Producer is irrelevant and isn't to be mentioned at trial. I don't agree but it's not an irrational ruling.
I took can agree with that ruling because none of the other producers are being charged. However, I was merely listing it as part of his responsibility over all... Not that it had to be part of the evidence. It would be like stating in a dozen of his other movies he carried fire arms and therefore this was not something he just happened upon and made a mistake like some child finding his father's gun. Since it was a regular part of his employment he had moral responsibility to practice safety.
The judge has ruled that Baldwin's role as Executive Producer is irrelevant and isn't to be mentioned at trial. I don't agree but it's not an irrational ruling.
I took can agree with that ruling because none of the other producers are being charged. However, I was merely listing it as part of his responsibility over all... Not that it had to be part of the evidence. It would be like stating in a dozen of his other movies he carried fire arms and therefore this was not something he just happened upon and made a mistake like some child finding his father's gun. Since it was a regular part of his employment he had moral responsibility to practice safety.
It doesn't matter now. Alec was acquitted because of prosecutorial misconduct. I would have preferred that a jury weigh the evidence.